Acton Institute Powerblog

Rethinking Wallis and the Tea Parties

Share this article:
Join the Discussion:

I’ve recently stumbled across the fantastic blog of Craig Carter, a professor at Tyndale University & Seminary in Toronto, and author of Rethinking Christ and Culture: A Post-Christendom Perspective. Take a moment to add it to your RSS reader of choice, and then go ahead and read his thorough critique of Jim Wallis’ hatchet job on the Tea Party movement.

Jordan J. Ballor Jordan J. Ballor (Dr. theol., University of Zurich; Ph.D., Calvin Theological Seminary) is a senior research fellow and director of publishing at the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion & Liberty. He is also a postdoctoral researcher in theology and economics at the VU University Amsterdam as part of the "What Good Markets Are Good For" project. He is author of Get Your Hands Dirty: Essays on Christian Social Thought (and Action) (Wipf & Stock, 2013), Covenant, Causality, and Law: A Study in the Theology of Wolfgang Musculus (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012) and Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology and the Church's Social Witness (Christian's Library Press, 2010), as well as editor of numerous works, including Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology. Jordan is also associate director of the Junius Institute for Digital Reformation Research at Calvin Theological Seminary.

Comments

  • Roger McKinney

    Carter’s gutting of Wallis is entertaining, but keep in mind that regressives don’t care one whit about reason and honesty. They are all about emotion. Against all evidence and common sense, they have decided that God has provided enough wealth for everyone to be rich if the rich would just share. In other words, no one produces wealth with work and skill; God simply provides it, like manna. Wallis calls it the “Gospel of Abundance.” Regressives hate the science of economics because it teaches the “false gospel of scarcity.”