Eurabia or God's Continent?

Thursday, June 7, 2007
One of my favorite historians of religion, who has recently acted more as a contemporary observer of religion than an historian, is Philip Jenkins of Pennsylvania State University. His newest book, God’s Continent, takes on the grimmer views of where Europe is headed. The focus is religion, but of course politics, economics, and foreign policy are all tied up in the issue as well. I happen to have a lot of sympathy for the darker view, represented not least ably by our own Sam Gregg (e.g., here and here). My pessimism has been tempered somewhat lately—among the reasons being comments by knowledgeable friends who see something significant in the election of Nicholas Sarkozy in France, and now by Jenkins’ book. But I remain skeptical of the optimistic view; Richard John Neuhaus’s review of Jenkins’ book in First Things gets it about right, I think.
Bookmark Eurabia or God's Continent?  at del.icio.us Digg Eurabia or God's Continent? Bloglines Eurabia or God's Continent? Technorati Eurabia or God's Continent? Bookmark Eurabia or God's Continent?  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Eurabia or God's Continent?  at Furl.net Bookmark Eurabia or God's Continent?  at reddit.com Bookmark Eurabia or God's Continent?  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Trackbacks

  1. No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  1. Dale Milne says:

    From John Neuhaus’ review:
    “In general, he says it is a mistake to treat Muslims as Muslims when, in fact, they are poor and marginalized immigrants who, in most cases, are only incidentally Muslims. He takes heart from “moderate” Muslim scholars who are subjecting the Qur’an to the same critical scholarship employed by Christians in dealing with their sacred texts. He cites approvingly Bassam Tibi, who urges Muslims to accept the terms of the Leitkultur (the guiding culture) of their new home. Bassam writes: “Religion may, of course, be practiced privately, but in public only citizenship counts. Such a concept would unite Muslims with non-Muslims.” ”

    That is exactly what has been happening in the United States for decades. The U.S. will prove to be the place where Sunni and Shi’a, and even Ahmadi and Ismaili live together in the greatest peace. It is in America that the most cooperation will occur between and among these groups, and the most intermarriage will occur between them and also with Christians and Jews -- and not just male Muslim a even female Muslims marrying across religious barriers.

    America may not be the most religious nation in the world; but in its effects, and despite occasional contrary actions, it is fulfilling the role of religion in defending the oppressed, feeding the hungry, arbitrating peace, uniting people, nations, religions, and even cultures.


Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.