'Call of the Philanthropist'

Wednesday, October 3, 2007
The new issue of Philanthropy Magazine features a cover story on Frank Hanna, vice chairman of the Acton Institute board of directors, and winner of the 2007 William E. Simon Prize for Philanthropic Leadership. The story is titled “Call of the Philanthropist,” a play on Acton’s Call of the Entrepreneur documentary, which features Hanna prominently.

The lengthy profile by Christopher Levenick offers insights into Hanna’s philanthropic activities and his philosophy of giving. Rev. Robert Sirico is quoted extensively, as are executives of other nonprofits that Hanna supports. For those who are interested in how philanthropy can be thoughtfully applied -- and effective -- the article is well worth reading.

Here’s Hanna on “indispensable causes:”
According to Hanna, donors should direct their funds only to causes they deem truly essential. “I believe,” he writes, “that the charities to which we give significant help should themselves be indispensable. In other words, their success should bring to mankind physical, intellectual, moral, or spiritual benefits of the most important kind, benefits without which mankind (or particular individuals) would be fundamentally diminished.”

Once philanthropists have identified the indispensable causes, they should restrict their donations to charities for which their support is truly indispensable. A small contribution to a massive organization will have marginal influence, at best. A series of marginal contributions is hardly better. Funds are always best spent where they will be put to the most effective use. If the organization can succeed without this donation, the money would be better spent on an organization that absolutely needs the funds to attain its objectives.

The Principle of Indispensability is designed to help maximize the leverage of charitable contributions. “Archimedes is credited with discovering how to use a lever to get seemingly disproportionate results,” says Hanna. “But Archimedes didn’t just stick his lever anywhere. He had to find the point of maximal leverage.” So too with philanthropy: Charitable donations achieve seemingly disproportionate results when they are directed to the point of maximal leverage.
Bookmark 'Call of the Philanthropist'  at del.icio.us Digg 'Call of the Philanthropist' Bloglines 'Call of the Philanthropist' Technorati 'Call of the Philanthropist' Bookmark 'Call of the Philanthropist'  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark 'Call of the Philanthropist'  at Furl.net Bookmark 'Call of the Philanthropist'  at reddit.com Bookmark 'Call of the Philanthropist'  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1

Wednesday, October 3, 2007
This issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality features a scholia translation of Cardinal Cajetan’s (1469-1534) influential treatise On Exchanging Money (1499). Cajetan is the author of the officially approved commentaries on the Summa of Thomas Aquinas, which are easily available in the magnificent Leonine edition of this magnum opus. He is even more famous as the papal legate whom Leo X (1513-1521) dispatched to Germany in a futile effort to bring Martin Luther back into the Roman fold. Economic historians have pointed out that Cajetan’s treatise holds a decisive place in the history of economics because it set forth the fullest and most unqualified defense of the foreign exchange market at its date of publication.

We are also pleased to publish Raymond de Roover’s essay, “Cardinal Cajetan on ‘Cambium’ or Exchange Dealings,” both as an introduction to the Cajetan scholia as well as “a testament to †Raymond de Roover’s original and enduring contribution to the field of economic historiography.” Likewise, this issue’s editorial by Stephen J. Grabill surveys “Raymond de Roover’s Enduring Contribution to Economic History.”

The editorial and article abstracts are freely available to nonsubscribers (you can sign up for a subscription here, including the very affordable electronic-only access option).

Other articles included in this issue:
  • “The Price of Freedom: Consumerism and Liberty in Secular Research and Catholic Teaching,” by Andrew V. Abela
  • “Ideas, Associations, and the Making of Good Cities,” by Robert Driscoll
  • “The Claim for Secularization as a Contemporary Utopia,” by Jan Klos
  • “The Fiscal and Tributary Philosophy of Antonio Rosmini,” by Carlos Hoevel
  • “A ‘Marketless World’? An Examination of Wealth and Exchange in the Gospels and First-Century Palestine,” by Edd S. Noell
  • “Intersubjectivity, Subjectivism, Social Sciences, and the Austrian School of Economics,” by Gabriel J. Zanotti
  • “Can Social Justice Be Achieved?” by José Manuel Moreira & Arnaud Pellissier Tanon
Also included is our usual outstanding fare of book reviews, courtesy the editorial oversight of Kevin Schmiesing.
Bookmark Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1  at del.icio.us Digg Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1 Bloglines Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1 Technorati Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1 Bookmark Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1  at Furl.net Bookmark Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1  at reddit.com Bookmark Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 10, Issue 1  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Clarence Thomas Interviews

Wednesday, October 3, 2007
You are probably aware by now that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has published a memoir. The interview-avoiding judge has lately been giving, as Kathryn Jean Lopez puts it, “a lifetime of interviews.”

Given the controversy surrounding his public life since his nomination to the Court, not much remains to be said about him, good or bad, that has not already been said. Suffice it to say that I draw attention to him now because: 1) My own view is that he is one the most interesting figures in 20th-century American history; 2) His record as a strict constructionist is a model of jurisprudence; 3) He once graced Acton’s annual dinner as the keynote speaker (you can still buy the CD); 4) He was spotted later at a D.C. area gym, wearing the Acton T-shirt that was presented to him at the dinner (or so goes the story much-repeated in the offices of the Institute).

Here’s a long interview with Thomas by Jan Crawford Greenburg of ABC. Here’s the Lopez interview on NRO.
Bookmark Clarence Thomas Interviews  at del.icio.us Digg Clarence Thomas Interviews Bloglines Clarence Thomas Interviews Technorati Clarence Thomas Interviews Bookmark Clarence Thomas Interviews  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Clarence Thomas Interviews  at Furl.net Bookmark Clarence Thomas Interviews  at reddit.com Bookmark Clarence Thomas Interviews  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Positive Freedom and Paternal Government

Wednesday, October 3, 2007
A quote from T. H. Green, refuting the view that the law’s “only business is to prevent interference with the liberty of the individual,” construed as doing what you like as long as it does not infringe on others’ rights to do what they want. Green writes:
The true ground of objection to ‘paternal government’ is not that it violates the ‘laissez faire’ principle and conceives that its office is to make people good, to promote morality, but that it rests on a misconception of morality. The real function of government being to maintain conditions of life in which morality shall be possible, and morality consisting in the disinterested performance of self-imposed duties, ‘paternal government’ does its best to make it impossible by narrowing the room for the self-imposition of duties and for the play of disinterested motives.

From Green’s Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation (PDF) [1883], quoted in Himmelfarb, The De-Moralization of Society, p. 152.

See also, “Moral Duties and Positive Rights.”
Bookmark Positive Freedom and Paternal Government  at del.icio.us Digg Positive Freedom and Paternal Government Bloglines Positive Freedom and Paternal Government Technorati Positive Freedom and Paternal Government Bookmark Positive Freedom and Paternal Government  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Positive Freedom and Paternal Government  at Furl.net Bookmark Positive Freedom and Paternal Government  at reddit.com Bookmark Positive Freedom and Paternal Government  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South

Wednesday, October 3, 2007
Related to last week’s post about Reformed education and Pentecostalism, I point you to this post by Rod Dreher, who discusses his interview with Josiah Idowu-Fearon, the Anglican Archbishop of Kaduna state in Nigeria. Dreher relates the following:
Pentecostalism is growing like wildfire, but there’s less to it than you might think. He said that in many cases, people are drawn to the emotional experience, and can tell you exactly when they gave their life to Jesus -- but can’t tell you a single thing about Christian doctrine. He said they’re finding in Nigeria that lots of the neo-charismatics have no discipline at all -- that they’re living exactly as they had before, but now with a Christian gloss. The substance of the faith hasn’t penetrated and changed their behavior.

Additionally, the archbishop pointed to the connection between the prosperity gospel and poverty: “He also said that Pentecostalism is a response to the poverty of the Third World.” You can look forward to a more complete interview with the archbishop in a forthcoming edition of the Dallas Morning News.
Bookmark Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South  at del.icio.us Digg Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South Bloglines Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South Technorati Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South Bookmark Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South  at Furl.net Bookmark Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South  at reddit.com Bookmark Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!