Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III

Friday, February 1, 2008
An update on the battle between Archbishop Chaput and the Colorado legislature over an ostensibly anti-discrimination bill that in fact infringes on religious liberty. (Acton’s Joseph Kosten ably defined the argument in this week’s commentary; I initially raised it here.)

Zenit reports on the back and forth between Chaput and the Anti-Defamation League’s Bruce DeBoskey, with Catholic Charities president Christopher Rose wading into the fray. Here’s Rose on the idea that laws forbidding government to discriminate on religious grounds apply to non-governmental entities:
Jewish Family Services doesn’t become a division of the U.S. Department of Human Services because it counsels low-income persons while receiving Medicaid dollars. […] If they do, then every private citizen becomes a government actor upon reaching age 65 and receiving Social Security benefits. And every taxpayer becomes a federal agency when he or she receives a tax rebate this spring. Receiving partial -- and sometimes inadequate -- compensation from the state to perform a public service does not transform a private agency into the government.

OK, I’m biased, but it sure looks to me like the Catholic side is winning this debate pretty handily. (“Catholic side” is tongue-in-cheek. I agree strongly with the contention that this bill threatens freedom of religious expression across the board.)
Bookmark Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III  at del.icio.us Digg Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III Bloglines Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III Technorati Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III Bookmark Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III  at Furl.net Bookmark Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III  at reddit.com Bookmark Colorado Catholic Charities Controversy III  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!