Late last month
I argued that recipients of the federal government’s stimulus package “should use this rebate money as they see fit, since they are the ones most familiar with their own situations and their own needs. Consider giving part of the money to charity or saving, paying off debt or investing.” Now other voices are giving similar advice, recommending saving rather than spending.
Rick Haglund, a Michigan business columnist for the
Grand Rapids Press,
notes that “Some saving measures can go a little too far, though. I recently heard a personal financial consultant say people can save by no longer buying that cup of coffee and newspaper on the way to work.”
“Give up the coffee, but please, please keep buying the paper. The newspaper business is in a terrible financial state,” he writes. Haglund thinks that newspapers are more important to the country than coffee...a debatable proposition. Coffee, not oil, might well be the lifeblood of American enterprise.
But the economic status of newspaper publishing is in a strange place. I’ve been getting the weekend paper for a year or so, and when I renewed I received a call from the paper just to tell me that I’d be getting the rest of the week for free (a good thing too, or I would have missed Haglund’s column).
It reminded me of getting a postcard in the mail from the government telling me to expect a rebate...no notice necessary, just send the free stuff and the money. I don’t think it cost the
Grand Rapids Press millions of dollars to make the phone calls, though (it cost the feds
$42 million to mail out those inane little rebate notices).
In any case, it makes more sense for many newspapers to give their issues away to get a boost in circulation numbers than it does to count on the income from subscriptions. I also recently saw one of
the narrowest daily newspapers I had ever seen last weekend, part of the trend to cut printing costs. (I can’t complain too much, though, since the Port Huron
Times Herald has published more than one of my commentaries. Keep up the good work!)
Of course, some folks,
like Betty J. Mazur, are going to do just what the government wants them to do with the money. “I’m going to buy new clothing with my check,” she said. (The piece linked above is in part about how it is necessary to file federal taxes for 2007 in order to get the 2008 rebate. Marketplace discusses that, and also debunks some myths about the rebate,
here.)
Oh, and don’t forget to blame conservative theology for the credit crisis. After all, it seems as if adherents to so-called “conservative” theology
don’t save as much as they ought.
How any decent sociologist could have this reaction is beyond me: “Keister was surprised that when demographic factors — such as education, age and race — were held as constant,
religion still proved to be an influential factor in wealth accumulation” (emphasis added).
Amazing, just amazing. Can you dare admit that
religious beliefs really do
influence behavior?
Keister says a typical “conservative Protestant” might be a member of the Assemblies of God, Churches of Christ, Nazarene and Pentecostal churches. I guess they’ve forgotten what
John Wesley said.
All that stuff we’ve heard about global warming being unquestionably responsible for more frequent devastating hurricanes? About how the devastation we saw after Hurricane Katrina would soon be the norm? Yeah, not so much:
Mon, 10/13/2008 13:58
"Is it really a ‘justifiable’ expression of moral, corporate, or personal responsibility to make a fast buck, at any [...]