Birth of Freedom Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages"

Monday, September 15, 2008
In this, the third video in Acton Media’s series of shorts accompanying its latest documentary The Birth of Freedom, Glenn Sunshine demonstrates how belief in human dignity spurred invention and innovation during the middle ages.

Acton Media’s video shorts from The Birth of Freedom are designed to provide additional insight into key issues and ideas in the film. A new short is released each Monday. Check out the rest of the series, learn about premieres in your area, and discover more background information at www.thebirthoffreedom.com.



Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages"  at del.icio.us Digg <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages" Bloglines <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages" Technorati <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages" Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages"  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages"  at Furl.net Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages"  at reddit.com Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: Inventions in the "Dark Ages"  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man

Monday, September 15, 2008
I am a great fan of “back to basics.” This is because the general population does not know what the educated person of my youth knew. Let’s take college education. The undergraduate university I attended had a heavy core curriculum. In philosophy alone there were five required courses in sequence. I would minoring with 21 credits. In theology there were four, again in sequence. In history there were three—two in sequence and one of the student’s choice. In political science there were two in sequence, same each with math and science. There were five in English, again in sequence. Today it is very rare to find such a core. Nowadays, a typical student is usually required to take an English writing course and then maybe one or two courses in each major area, not in sequence, but of his own choosing. The result is that the student’s knowledge is a hodge-podge, rather than a sequential building from a foundation. So the foundations are missing or shoddy.

I was a critic on panel at a scholarly conference in Texas once. I was assigned a person’s paper to critique, and the jist of my argument was that the whole argument was founded on Nominalism. Since the other person had a doctorate as well as I, I assumed that we would have a fruitful discussion over the very foundation of the professor’s paper and research, where she would have to defend the nominalist basis of the paper. But, instead of addressing my critique, she discussed another person’s paper, which was not her job. After the panel ended, I asked another person on the panel who had been a former student of mine, why this happened. He threw up his hands and said, “Philosophically illiterate?”

This is exactly my point. This person’s knowledge base was very flawed such that she did not know a very basic concept that all students (even those with only a B. A.) in my generation who had attended at least Catholic universities would be familiar with.

So what I am going to do now is discuss in the following series the fundamentals of man’s nature and how it plays out in everyday life.

The big point to remember here is that both society and the market are sui generis: that is to say, self-generating. They come from themselves. No one created society except the people who live in it. And they did it by there multitudinous interactions. They did it by the interactions of a free people, exercising their freedom. Adam Smith correctly called this the system of natural liberty. It is natural because God gave all human beings a free will, just like his. God created the universe absolutely freely, and gave his creatures a free will. He also gave us reason, similar to His, but his reason is so far above ours, it is not that similar. Hence, our free will is more like God’s than our reason.

Continue reading "The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man"
Bookmark The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man  at del.icio.us Digg The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man Bloglines The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man Technorati The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man Bookmark The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man  at Furl.net Bookmark The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man  at reddit.com Bookmark The Foundations of Understanding the Market, Understanding Man  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick

Monday, September 15, 2008
There’s a good read from a state politician familiar with Kwame Kilpatrick, the former Detroit mayor accused of all manner of illicit activity, in the Sep. 12 newsletter (PDF) from Michigan state senator Mickey Switalski (D-Roseville). Switalski’s newsletter is one of the best and is atypical among state politicians, because he writes the content himself.

Before his current run as a state senator, Switalski was a state representative during Kilpatrick’s tenure as Democratic Floor Leader, the #2 position in the Democratic caucus. In his piece on Kilpatrick, Switalski offers what you might expect to be a sympathetic perspective, given their time spent as colleagues and their shared party affiliation (I spent a semester as a legislative intern for then-Representative Switalski in the spring of 2000). Yet Switalski offers what I think is a fair and balanced assessment, based on his judgment that Kilpatrick “is a complex person with many strengths and some tragic weaknesses.”

“The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick” is a narrative embodying the wisdom of Lord Acton’s dictum that “power tends to corrupt.” Switalski gives us an inside look at state politics, describing the legislature as “an insane asylum,” given the turbulent dynamics at the time. But Kilpatrick was a voice of reason and stability during the ravages of partisan bickering.

Ultimately Switalski judges that Kilpatrick “had too much power too early. He indulged his prodigious appetites and lacked the maturity and judgment to control his desires and became corrupt.”

Switalski wonders, “Were these faults always there?”

“I suppose they were,” he answers.
But how could a man who saw public service with such clarity in 2000 become so blind and ethically lost just a few years later? It is a sad tale, both for him and for the City. Unlike many people I know, who seemed to relish in his failure, I took no joy in watching him self-destruct. It was an awful waste of talent and opportunity. It was a tragedy for the City and the Region.

I pray his successors will not let power lead them into temptation, and so avoid a similar fate.

Switalski is correct to point to the tragedy of the demise of Kwame Kilpatrick, and that we should always realize the danger that power presents and the responsibility that it entails.

Even those who recognize, as Kwame did, that politicians have a duty to their constituents and “doing good policy for the people we serve” can be corrupted by the illusions of power and the delusions of privilege.
Bookmark The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick  at del.icio.us Digg The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick Bloglines The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick Technorati The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick Bookmark The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick  at Furl.net Bookmark The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick  at reddit.com Bookmark The Rise and Fall of Kwame Kilpatrick  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!