Thanks to P. Koshy @pkoshyin and Saurabh Srivastava @SKS_Mumbai for linking this 1996 Religion & Liberty gem on Twitter. Author Mario Gómez-Zimmerman argues that Hinduism “pre-figures capitalism much closer than socialism.” More:

As it is true for all the great religions, Hinduism warns human beings about the dangers of accumulating wealth, and at times demands them to renounce it. But in all cases, wealth is attacked because it is likely to subject man to dependency, fostering egoism, greed, and avarice, and not for being an evil in itself. In fact, wealth is considered a good to be pursued within the spheres of worldly affairs, trying at the same time to remain detached from it, which is the way to spiritual evolution. In Hinduism, this aspect is commonly referred to as renouncing the fruit of labor. It is made with the provision that renunciation must be a voluntary act, because it is acknowledged that only a few are prepared to follow the path to perfection in a strict manner. Literature on this is vast, so I will limit myself to sample what Sai Baba and Prabhupada (the first considered by many as the Avatar of our time, the second the founder of the International Society for the Conscience of Krishna) have to say about this. To quote Sai Baba: “When a man has a right to engage in Karma, he has a right also for the fruit; no one can deny this or refuse his right. On his part, Prabhupada states that, according to the Law of Karma, wealth is the result of a good previous labor, and that the Lord leaves man independent to engage in the activities proper to the material world.

Read “The Capitalist Structures of Hinduism” in Religion & Liberty.


  • Anonymous

     “The Lord leaves a man independent to engage in the activities proper to the material world.” ~ Prabhupada

    “Where a man’s treasure is, there will be his heart also.” – Christ

    These men do not seem to be in favor of redispersing the wealth. Most religions are concerned with how a man handles his money (or lack of it). At some point, our government steps over the line and plays God by making demands on our personal assets. God seems to be in favor of letting man voluntarily choose to contribute to the relief of the poor. I like God’s approach much better. At some point the government’s demands become so burdensome as to compete with a man’s financial ability to give to his church or other worthy causes. That is not IMHO separation of church and state.

  • Pingback: hinduism - CASTE SYSTEM – CASTE SYSTEM