Canada's Faltering Freedom

Tuesday, June 17, 2008
The problem is not unique to Canada, nor entirely absent from the US, but our neighbors to the north seem to be doing their best at the moment to lead the so-called free world in denying what Americans call the First Amendment rights (speech, religion, etc.). In fact, the Canadian government’s quashing of the expression of opinion—executed through its “human rights commission”—is downright frightening. It is trite to describe this kind of thing as Orwellian, but that’s what it is.

In Canada and elsewhere, the unpopular opinions most in danger of being declared verboten tend to revolve around two issues: Islam and homosexuality.

The case of Mark Steyn, in hot water for criticizing Islam, has gotten some press, because he’s a well-known writer attached to powerful friends. See here and here.

This recent piece by David Warren in the Ottawa Citizen recounts some other cases, equally disturbing, which have gone less remarked.
Bookmark Canada's Faltering Freedom  at del.icio.us Digg Canada's Faltering Freedom Bloglines Canada's Faltering Freedom Technorati Canada's Faltering Freedom Bookmark Canada's Faltering Freedom  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Canada's Faltering Freedom  at Furl.net Bookmark Canada's Faltering Freedom  at reddit.com Bookmark Canada's Faltering Freedom  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Trackbacks

  1. No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  1. daddio says:

    As Canada goes, so goes the world? (heh, heh!)

  2. Linda says:

    I’ve recently joined a coalition of bloggers who are speaking out (while we still can) against these kangaroo courts. Please lend your support by keeping up with the issue (and donating to legal defense funds if you can!) - some good blogs to visit are: Ezra Levant and Free Mark Steyn! - from these you’ll find links to others blogging for our freedom.

  3. Constitutional Federalist says:

    Thanks, Linda.

    First they remove the Bill of Rights (no taxation of income, and senators selected other than by mob-vote), then they squelch harmless speech cause it causes someone a tear. It’s their decisions that bring tears!

  4. Colin says:

    This is why I support organizations that fight “thought policing”.

    http://www.thefire.org/


Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.