The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama

Thursday, August 7, 2008
Mark Tooley pens another brilliant critique of the latest endeavors of the religious left in this piece titled “God’s Welfare State” in FrontPage Magazine. The commentary is a response marked with reason and clarity to left-leaning interfaith groups who are calling for more government programs and initiatives to tackle poverty. Tooley also notes in his piece that the signers of the letter calling for Senator John McCain and Senator Barack Obama to address their party conventions with a ten year plan to end poverty, are the usual suspects who equate “The federal welfare state with God’s Kingdom.” Tooley always seems to have a knack at getting to the heart of the issue, and he concludes by simply noting:
The left-leaning religious officials, guided by 100 years of statist Social Gospel, want to wage a government-led coercive struggle against “poverty” in the abstract. But most of their religious traditions express God’s love for specific poor people, while emphasizing voluntary and relational charity towards the needy. This historic stance of these religions towards the poor understandably has less appeal to the Religious Left, which often is more preoccupied with political power than with concrete compassion.

Bookmark The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama  at del.icio.us Digg The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama Bloglines The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama Technorati The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama Bookmark The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama  at Furl.net Bookmark The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama  at reddit.com Bookmark The Religious Left Offers Advice to McCain and Obama  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Trackbacks

  1. No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  1. Tracy says:

    I definitely agree with the artcle’s point that the political candidates are only interested in the political power winning the votes of the nation from their global solution to proverty views. However, I do support the goverment addressing the problem in reducing povery. This issue needs to be addressed whether we end up spending money or not. There are so many children who lack the basic needs in poor countries and including the United States. I think specifically we need to come up with a plan to reduce poverty in this U.S. and Globally. I definitely know this is a difficult problem, but substantial measures from spending money for “Free Trade products” or providing money to end debt in poor countries, can reduce debt in order for poor countries to develop freely to trade goods or create wealth including education, health care and shelter.
    I definitely know that the Faith Based and religious organizations are realize the funds/resources must come from large majority vote from the government to win the war on global poverty.


Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.