Matthew 19:23-26 (New International Version)

Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?” Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

During an appearance last week on “Hardball with Chris Matthews,” Congressman Charles Rangel from New York did us all the service of exegeting the above passage from the Scriptures.

Here’s the exchange:

MATTHEWS: I mean, Charlie, Jesus didn’t hang around with the swells, the rich people.

RANGEL: Well, he said the rich are going straight to hell.


MATTHEWS: Well, he did not.



MATTHEWS: He said it is harder to get through a needle’s…


RANGEL: No. But the deal with St. Matthews and all these people are trying to get into heaven. And he said, hey, when I was hungry, you didn’t feed me. I was thirsty. I was naked. I was sick. You didn’t do all theseā€”he’s talking about food stamps, Social Security.


RANGEL: He’s talking about taking care of those who haven’t got. So, when it comes to moral value, my Republican friends can decide which side the pope was on.

It’s refreshing that Chris Matthews was keen enough to provide a somewhat more accurate description of Jesus’ words than did Rep. Rangel. So often, however, the critically important conclusion to the exchange between Jesus and his disciples is overlooked: “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

But back to Rangel’s point. In Jesus’ words about the sheep and the goats (Matthew 25:31-46), was Jesus talking about food stamps and Social Security? Or was he talking about the practice of private charity? Or something else?

Rep. Rangel has long held that the biblical mandate to care for the poor, the orphan, and the widow is identical with the activities of the governmental welfare state. Here’s video of an exchange from Jan. 20, 1995 between Rep. Rangel and Rev. Robert Sirico on “Illegitimacy and Welfare,” testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee.

HT: hubs and spokes

  • Congressman Charlie Rangel vs. Rev. Robert A. Sirico of the Acton Institute – a matchup for the ages. “no mas!”…

  • In response to this post Michelle Malkin linked to, PowerBlog provides the link to video testimony before
    the House Ways and Means Committee from Jan. 20, 1995, specifically an
    exchange between Rep. Rangel and Rev. Robert Sirico on “Illegitimacy
    and Welfare” .

  • John

    Jesus was referring to those Jews who knew the Law and yet were complicit with the King in his land theft. The Herods took the ancestral land from each of Judea’s families, bundled it and gave it to friends and cronys. The dispossessed families then became tenant farmers, if they were kept on at all. So, at that time the country was full of poor people with a few rich folks. If these rich folks were Jews, then they knew the Law and were egregious lawbreakers. That’s why Jesus condemned them.