What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught

Thursday, November 3, 2005
Aaah, the magical soothing balm that is government regulation!

The delightfully titled Now Batting for Pedro Borbon blog (“Manny Mota...Mota...Mota”) reveals the (predictable) results of governmental efforts to “increase transparency” in the business world:
So, let’s review. The law that was supposed to ensure greater transparency and make the stock market safe for all of us, especially the little guy, is driving companies to purge the little guy, become less transparent, and shun our world-class public capital markets.

Score another beaut for the Great Sausage Factory!

“We’re from the government, and we’re here to help you,” indeed...

Regardless, it seems to me that this is yet another opportunity to reflect on the importance of maintaining ethical business practices in both large and small corporations. As you recall, Sarbanes-Oxley was the congressional response to the various Enron-Worldcom type business accounting scandals in the late 90’s. Those scandals - a result of a distinct lack of ethical practices - resulted in a lot of people losing a lot of money, public distrust of corporations, and a resulting governmental response to the public outcry. The final links in this chain of events include massive new costs for businesses in order to comply with the new regulations, and now the phenomenon noted above. In other words, everyone loses. Returning to and reinforcing core ethical principles, however, creates a situation in which everyone can win.
Bookmark What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught  at del.icio.us Digg What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught Bloglines What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught Technorati What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught Bookmark What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught  at Furl.net Bookmark What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught  at reddit.com Bookmark What Sarbanes-Oxley Hath Wraught  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Trackbacks

  1. No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  1. No comments


Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.