Untitled 4Even when we agree on what Biblical principles should guide our political choices, evangelicals from the left and right rarely agree on policy solutions. But there is one area where there appears to be an increasingly significant level of agreement: the immorality of our national debt.

At Christianity Today, David P. Gushee — an ethicist and politically progressive evangelical — explains why the $17 trillion national debt is both immoral and unwise:

Most progressive evangelicals who address government spending focus on compassion issues. They connect God’s care for the poor to U.S. government spending priorities. This often seems to mean by default that all cuts to social welfare spending are bad, and that all increases are good.

I agree with my progressive evangelical allies that our government—which projects spending $3.77 trillion in fiscal 2014—seems to have sufficient resources to provide for the sick, the aged, the poor, and the uninsured. I agree with an overall reading of the Bible that prioritizes physical human needs over most other priorities. But I protest a too-easy move from “God cares for the poor and calls Christians to do the same” to “God wants the secular government of the United States to spend x on social welfare.” Translating a sacred text into a political ethic is not that easy.

Still, we have a moral problem on our hands: While our nation budgets $3.77 trillion for spending in fiscal 2014, it forecasts revenue of $744 billion less than that. If a nation does that for long enough, it ends up with a debt of $17 trillion—and rising.

A government that develops a pattern of spending considerably more than it raises behaves immorally. But its immorality is not simply the immorality-as-immediate-hardheartedness-to-the-poor, so often decried by my friends.

Read more . . .

Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy

Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy

Father Sirico argues that a free economy actually promotes charity, selflessness, and kindness, and why free-market capitalism is not only the best way to ensure individual success and national prosperity but is also the surest route to a moral and socially-just society.

Visit the official website at www.defendingthefreemarket.com

$25.00

  • http://rdmckinney.blogspot.com/ Roger D. McKinney

    The national debt is not a moral issue; it’s purely practical and
    economic. It would be immoral if the government borrowed without
    intending to repay the debt. The immorality happens when the Fed
    destroys the value of the money so that it pays off debt with money
    worth much less. This is the sin/crime of using false measures and
    weights condemned in the OT. It’s also a sin/crime for politicians to
    break the law and all presidents, congressmen and judges have done that
    for 150 years by violating the Constitution. When Supreme Court justices
    violate the original intention of the Constitution and claim that the
    document gives the government powers that the writers never intended,
    they have become criminals, and any president or congressman who goes
    along with the justices’ crimes are criminals as well. There is a lot of
    immorality in our government, but it’s not in borrowing money.
    (rdmckinney.blogspot.com)

    • http://Culture11.com Joe Carter

      You don’t think it’s immoral to run up debts that other people (your descendants) will have to pay back?

      • http://rdmckinney.blogspot.com/ Roger D. McKinney

        No, I don’t think it is immoral. I think we should be careful about how we define morality and keep it simple and limited to what the Bible defines as immorality. Very few things are immoral. I think it is impractical and unwise, but not immoral. It’s neither dishonest nor theft or fraud.