Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Case Challenging Affordable Care ActArchbishop William Lori of Baltimore and Cardinal Sean O’Malley, Archbishop of Boston, are asking the Catholic faithful and others to reach out to their senators in response to a piece of legislation known as “Protect Women’s Health From Corporate Interference Act of 2014” (S. 2578.) Lori is the chairman for the United State’s Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee for Religious Liberty, and O’Malley serves as chair for the USCCB’s Committee on Pro-Life Activities.

According to the letter on the USCCB website, the legislation is an attempt to reduce religious freedom, and puts health coverage above one of America’s most cherished freedoms. The bishops list several concerns:

    • This new legislation “appears to override  ‘any other provision of Federal law’ that protects religious freedom or rights of conscience regarding health coverage mandates.”
    • This bill would “rollback” not only federally-protected conscience clauses regarding artificial birth control “but to any ‘specific health care item or service’ that is mandated by any federal law or regulation.” In the future, if the executive branch decides to add late-term abortions (for example) to mandated health care coverage, employers would have no recourse.
    • This bill applies to all employers, not simply for-profit employers.
    • The bill would extend its reach past employees, to their dependents. For instance, a teen girl may wish to have an abortion over her parent’s objection, and the parent’s health care package would have to pay for it. The daughter would be federally-entitled to the abortion coverage.
    • The bishops believe this type of legislation will lead to employers dropping health care coverage for employees all together.

In short, the bill does not befit a nation committed to religious liberty. Indeed, if it were to pass, it would call that commitment into question. Nor does it show a genuine commitment to expanded health coverage, as it would pressure many Americans of faith to stop providing or purchasing health coverage altogether.

Reps. Louise Slaughter (D-NY), Diana DeGette (D-CO), and Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) introduced the bill in the House of Representatives; Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Mark Udall (D-CO) sponsored companion legislation in the Senate. This legislation was drafted in response to the Supreme Court’s recent decision regarding Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Woods, which upheld employers’ right to not pay for health care measures that violated the employers’ religious beliefs. A press release from the representatives sponsoring the bill said,

This bill will ensure that employee access to critical health services is not at the mercy of their bosses’ religious beliefs. Congress never intended to allow corporate employers to block employee access to critical preventive services like birth control. We hope that our colleagues will join us in acting quickly to correct the Supreme Court’s decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. Our bill simply protects employees’ rights to all federally mandated health services, including contraception. A woman’s private medical decisions should be between her, her doctor, and whomever else she wishes to consult – they should not be subject to approval by politicians, Supreme Court justices, or bosses.

The legislation overlooks the fact that the Supreme Court decision does not stop any woman in the United States from using artificial birth control, so-called “morning-after” pills or seeking abortions. The decision only states that employers whose religious beliefs find these types of medication or procedures to be morally reprehensible do not have to pay for them. Marcia Greenberger, co-president of the National Women’s Law Center remarked, “Bosses should stick to what they know best—the board room and the bottom line—and stay out of the bedroom and exam room.” Some bosses are trying to do just that: stay out of it, yet they are being told they must pay for every exam room situation. Pregnancy is not a disease, artificial birth control is inexpensive and easy to purchase, and employee health insurance cannot trump religious liberty. Americans’ freedom of religion is far too precious to be frittered away by legislation such as this.

Faith, Freedom and Modernity: Christianity and Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century

Faith, Freedom and Modernity: Christianity and Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century

Author Jan Klos shows how liberalism is unable to maintain itself without a vigorous cultural commitment to a Christian understanding of man.

$10.00
  • simplynotred

    Stopping the bill in the House is all that is needed at this time.

  • Scott in PA

    The bishops supported Obamacare. Where did they think that was leading?
    You can’t have religious freedom without economic freedom. Maybe the bishops should come down on the side of economic freedom for a change.