Acton Institute Powerblog

The high cost of air pollution: trillions of dollars and millions of premature deaths

Share this article:
Join the Discussion:

airpollutionAir pollution is now the world’s fourth-leading fatal health risk, causing one in ten deaths in 2013. According to a new study by the World Bank, the premature deaths due to air pollution costs the global economy about $225 billion in lost labor income, or about $5.11 trillion in welfare losses worldwide. That is about the size of the gross domestic product of India, Canada, and Mexico combined, notes the report

While we tend to think of air pollution as occurring in the urban areas of the developed world, most of the deaths are due to poor air quality in rural and underdeveloped regions:

Billions of people around the world continue to depend on burning solid fuels such as wood, charcoal, coal, and dung in their homes for cooking and heating. Consequently, the health risk posed by air pollution is the greatest in developing countries. In 2013 about 93 percent of deaths and nonfatal illnesses attributed to air pollution worldwide occurred in these countries, where 90 percent of the population was exposed to dangerous levels of air pollution. Children under age 5 in lower-income countries are more than 60 times as likely to die from exposure to air pollution as children in high-income countries.

While the monetary cost of air pollution is shocking, it’s likely even more than is estimated in the report. “The figure could be very much more if it included health costs,” said Urvashi Narain, lead author and senior environmental economist for the World Bank. “We did not include the costs of [morbidity] illnesses caused by pollution.”

“The scale of the problem is truly daunting,” added Narain. “The poor are more likely to live in polluted areas and are less able to access healthcare.”

These economic costs of air pollution have also increased significantly over time, claims the report. Between 1990 and 2013, total welfare losses due to premature mortality from exposure to air pollution increased by 94 percent. Damages from exposure to ambient air pollution also rose by 63 percent between 1990 and 2013, to $3.552 trillion, while damages from household air pollution from cooking with solid fuels rose by 287 percent, to $1.516 trillion.

Joe Carter Joe Carter is a Senior Editor at the Acton Institute. Joe also serves as an editor at the The Gospel Coalition, a communications specialist for the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, and as an adjunct professor of journalism at Patrick Henry College. He is the editor of the NIV Lifehacks Bible and co-author of How to Argue like Jesus: Learning Persuasion from History's Greatest Communicator (Crossway).

Comments

  • Courts were making a huge dent in pollution before the EPA. Those who were damaged by it sued those who caused it and received the money from the accused if they won. The only change the EPA made was that the federal government got the money and not those damaged by pollution.

  • Pollution is a property issue. Most free marketeers have always and everywhere acknowledged the role of the government in protecting property. Courts were doing a good job of it before the EPA. The EPA did nothing new but take the money. There has never been a free marketeer who thought the market could do everything and anything. They have always seen a role for religion, family, civil society and the government. They just thought the state should stay out of the market. The idea that markets could replace them all was a pure Marxist fabrication.