Sportsmen think global warming is a threat?

Monday, May 15, 2006
In the in-box, this interesting survey from Nate at Field & Stream:

A new survey conducted by the National Wildlife Federation (the results of which are being hosted exclusively on fieldandstream.com) shows that:
  • 76 percent of sportsmen believe global warming is occurring
  • 71 percent believe it’s a serious threat to fish and wildlife
  • 78 percent believe the U.S. should reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases like CO2

even though:

  • 73 percent consider themselves conservative to moderate on political issues
  • 50 percent consider themselves evangelical Christians

and

  • 53 percent voted for Bush (compared to 29 percent for John Kerry)

Here’s the link to the full survey. I have lots of brothers in Christ who are outdoorsman and know they have been conservation conscious for generations. But I’m surprised the numbers are that high. I’ve emailed Nate back to see if we can get more details on this; worth expanding on.

[Originally posted at The Evangelical Ecologist]


Bookmark Sportsmen think global warming is a threat?  at del.icio.us Digg Sportsmen think global warming is a threat? Bloglines Sportsmen think global warming is a threat? Technorati Sportsmen think global warming is a threat? Bookmark Sportsmen think global warming is a threat?  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Sportsmen think global warming is a threat?  at Furl.net Bookmark Sportsmen think global warming is a threat?  at reddit.com Bookmark Sportsmen think global warming is a threat?  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Trackbacks

  1. No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  1. Jordan says:

    I think it shows us what a massively funded, complexly coordinated, and pervasively distributed PR project can accomplish, especially when its message coheres so well with the political inclinations of a credulous mainstream media.

  2. Morton Snorfman says:

    As a small “c” conservative and life member of Trout Unlimited, I say “Amen, Jordan!”

    This survey is a mess and deserves a mention on junkscience.com as junk worth debunking.
    If you visit NWF’s page, http://www.targetglobalwarming.org/, and check out any of the “Impacts for your state” each and every PDF is but a paean to the supposed merits of the Kyoto Protocol (more like “Induce Global Poverty Protocol”) and each contains loads more weasel words, i.e. could, might, etc., than I’ve seen since I used to read Greenpeace “scientific” studies for a living.


Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.