In response to Sir Nicholas Stern’s cost/benefit analysis of dealing with climate change, Christopher Monckton, former adviser to Margaret Thatcher and journalist, has published an article (a second will be published next week) and what looks like a very long, researched and documented paper [pdf] explaining why the “consensus” regarding global warming is not correct. Here is a summary of his argument:
Posts tagged with: christopher monckton
In the Last Week
- Everyday Christianity: A Faith Free From The Accidental Pharisaism of Missional, Radical, Crazy and Other Superlatives (1,494 views)
by Anthony Bradley - Why Jesus is (Probably) Not a Keynesian (821 views)
by Joseph Sunde - Narcissism and the Minimum Wage Are Destroying Opportunities (451 views)
by Anthony Bradley - 5 Facts About Fatherhood In The United States For Father's Day (398 views)
by Elise Hilton - Pathological Altruism: When 'Good Intentions' Aren't So Good (331 views)
by Joseph Sunde
- Acton Commentary (260)
- Acton Media (77)
- Acton University (48)
- Bible and Theology (579)
- Christian Social Thought (266)
- Economic Freedom (77)
- Economics (114)
- General (590)
- Individual Liberty (174)
- Interviews (34)
- News and Events (2343)
- On Call in Culture (55)
- Poverty (122)
- PowerBlog Ramblings (53)
- PowerLinks (133)
- Programs (64)
- Public Policy (2075)
- Publications (214)
- Religious Liberty (39)
- Shareholder Activism (3)
- Shareholder Proxy Resolutions (3)
- Technology (15)
- Vatican (227)
- Virtue (53)
- Vocation (6)