Greg Forster’s latest response to Sam Gregg, Acton’s director of research, on the utility of John Locke’s thought today is up over at Public Discourse. There’s a lot to learn from reading these exchanges, but right now I want to focus just briefly on one of the criticisms that Sam levels against Locke. Comparing Locke’s definition of Law to that of Aquinas, Sam finds Locke to be quite wanting. For Locke, “Law’s formal definition is the declaration of a superior will.”
Posts tagged with: Definition
In the Last Week
- The New Legalism: Missional, Radical, Narcissistic, and Shamed (1,889 views)
by Anthony Bradley - Obama Administration Orders Colleges to Implement Unconstitutional Speech Codes (1,104 views)
by Joe Carter - One Man's Great Escape from North Korea (537 views)
by Ray Nothstine - Should We Be Eating More Bugs? (357 views)
by Joe Carter - What's a Few Dead Eagles Between Friends? (299 views)
by Joe Carter
- Acton Commentary (256)
- Acton Media (76)
- Acton University (46)
- Bible and Theology (575)
- Christian Social Thought (241)
- Economic Freedom (69)
- Economics (102)
- General (583)
- Individual Liberty (161)
- Interviews (25)
- News and Events (2304)
- On Call in Culture (50)
- Poverty (113)
- PowerBlog Ramblings (53)
- PowerLinks (112)
- Programs (64)
- Public Policy (2052)
- Publications (212)
- Religious Liberty (30)
- Shareholder Activism (3)
- Shareholder Proxy Resolutions (3)
- Technology (15)
- Vatican (225)
- Virtue (47)
- Vocation (1)