In Part 4, we saw that post-Enlightenment philosophical currents such as Humean empiricism, utilitarianism, and legal positivism are the real culprits in the demise of natural law and not theological criticism from within Reformation theology, as many today take for granted. If this is so, why is contemporary Protestant theology so critical of natural law?
Posts tagged with: john calvin
In Part 3, we examined why many contemporary Protestants have something of a bad conscience when it comes to natural law. But, of course, the blame for this cannot be laid fully upon Karl Barth. Even a hint of a fuller explanation has to address intellectual currents that begin to gather momentum in the so-called Enlightenment. One popular explanation within the academic mainstream for the demise of the natural-law tradition in modern Protestant theology attributes it to a form of implosion. And this is what I want to take up here.
In the Last Week
- Everyday Christianity: A Faith Free From The Accidental Pharisaism of Missional, Radical, Crazy and Other Superlatives (1,644 views)
by Anthony Bradley - 'No Religion, Please. We're European.' (549 views)
by Elise Hilton - Narcissism and the Minimum Wage Are Destroying Opportunities (484 views)
by Anthony Bradley - Pathological Altruism: When 'Good Intentions' Aren't So Good (457 views)
by Joseph Sunde - The New Legalism: Missional, Radical, Narcissistic, and Shamed (424 views)
by Anthony Bradley
- Acton Commentary (260)
- Acton Media (77)
- Acton University (49)
- Bible and Theology (580)
- Christian Social Thought (267)
- Economic Freedom (77)
- Economics (115)
- General (590)
- Individual Liberty (174)
- Interviews (34)
- News and Events (2344)
- On Call in Culture (55)
- Poverty (122)
- PowerBlog Ramblings (53)
- PowerLinks (133)
- Programs (64)
- Public Policy (2075)
- Publications (214)
- Religious Liberty (39)
- Shareholder Activism (3)
- Shareholder Proxy Resolutions (3)
- Technology (15)
- Vatican (227)
- Virtue (53)
- Vocation (6)