My recent piece in The American Spectator took the left to task for its misuse of the terms justice and social justice. The piece was more than a debate over semantics. In it I noted that Sojourners and its CEO, Jim Wallis, continue to promote well-intended but failed strategies that actually hurt the social and economic well-being of poor communities. I also called on everyone with a heart for the poor to set aside a top-down model of charity that “has trapped so many humans in a vicious cycle of paternalism and dependency” and instead to focus “on cultivating political and economic freedom for the world’s poor.” Sojourners’ Tim King responded here and then emailed me to ask for my thoughts on his response. I’ll start by emphasizing a few areas of agreement, adding a caveat here and there so as not to overstate the areas of overlap, and then I’ll move on to some areas of difference.
Posts tagged with: Pro-life movement
In the Last Week
- The New Legalism: Missional, Radical, Narcissistic, and Shamed (1,904 views)
by Anthony Bradley - Obama Administration Orders Colleges to Implement Unconstitutional Speech Codes (1,105 views)
by Joe Carter - One Man's Great Escape from North Korea (546 views)
by Ray Nothstine - Should We Be Eating More Bugs? (364 views)
by Joe Carter - What's a Few Dead Eagles Between Friends? (299 views)
by Joe Carter
- Acton Commentary (256)
- Acton Media (76)
- Acton University (46)
- Bible and Theology (575)
- Christian Social Thought (241)
- Economic Freedom (69)
- Economics (102)
- General (583)
- Individual Liberty (161)
- Interviews (25)
- News and Events (2304)
- On Call in Culture (50)
- Poverty (113)
- PowerBlog Ramblings (53)
- PowerLinks (112)
- Programs (64)
- Public Policy (2052)
- Publications (212)
- Religious Liberty (30)
- Shareholder Activism (3)
- Shareholder Proxy Resolutions (3)
- Technology (15)
- Vatican (225)
- Virtue (47)
- Vocation (1)