Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed

Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Pope Benedict’s visit to secular France and its reformist President Sarkozy has proved to be successful above all expectations, as reported by Vatican newspaper L’Osseservatore Romano. During his Paris homily, at the Esplanade des Invalides, the Holy Father encouraged the 250,000 faithful in attendance to turn to God and to reject false idols, such as money, thirst for material possessions and power.

In his homily the Pope referred to the teachings of Saint Paul to the early Christian communities in which the Apostle warned the ancients of idolatry and greed. The Pope explained how modern society has created its own idols just as the pagans had done in antiquity.

The Pope emphasized that these idols represent a “delusion” that distracts man from reality, that is, from his “true destiny” and “places him in a kingdom of mere appearances” as quoted in Zenit’s article. Benedict underlined that the Church’s condemnation of such idolatry is not, however, a condemnation of the individuals per se, but more so of the evil temptations themselves.

“In our judgments, we must never confuse the sin, which is unacceptable, with the sinner, the state of whose conscience we cannot judge and who, in any case, is always capable of conversion and forgiveness,” he said.

The Pope recognized that the path to God is not always easy, but through the Eucharist, he said, man understands that God “teaches us to shun idols, the illusions of our minds” and that “Christ is the sole and the true Saviour, the only one who points out to man the path to God.”

This does not mean that the Benedict condemns business, trade, all the positive economic phenomenon that allow for wealth and prosperity. But concerned for France’s extreme tendencies toward materialistic relativism, the Pope rightly pointed out how France cannot marginalize itself from religion.

Benedict’s sermon strongly underlined how every believer in the light of God should pursue his own vocation, which may include business or particular talent God has instilled in him.

Had it not been so, I doubt that secular and business orientated President Sarkozy would have ignored State protocol and met the religious leader on his arrival at the airport. The French President was eager to promote “a new dialogue” with the Church and to talk about the need of a “positive laicity” in Europe and its expanding economic unity.
Bookmark Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed  at del.icio.us Digg Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed Bloglines Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed Technorati Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed Bookmark Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed  at Furl.net Bookmark Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed  at reddit.com Bookmark Pope Bendedict Warns France on Money, Power and Greed  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon

Tuesday, April 29, 2008
A fight broke out this week between non-profit groups over fundraising. While not in direct competition for donor dollars, the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance expressed its displeasure with Meijer, Inc. for participating in a fundraising event with the Humane Society of the United States. The program was set up to contribute money to a support Foreclosure Pets Fund, designed to give support to pet owners facing foreclosure.

Meijer suspended the program after fielding complaints from the Alliance that the chain was cooperating with an anti-hunting organization. What does pet foreclosure have to do with anti-hunting? An Alliance statement gets at the crux of the issue, pointing out, “The money donated to the HSUS through this promotion, while not going directly to its anti-hunting campaign, will free up money from the organization’s general fund that can be used to attack the right of sportsmen.”

We put the “fun” in “fungibility.”
That, my friends, is called fungibility, a fancy word that simply is used to identify the ability for money or funds to be transferred between sectors of a balance sheet and across budgets. I don’t want to adjudicate the dispute and attempt to determine whether or not the Humane Society really is anti-hunting, but the cogency of the Alliance’s argument hinges on a valuable lesson, what I’m calling here the “fungibility phenomenon.”

When you give to an organization and you earmark the funds to be used in a particular way, you may be inclined to think that your money is somehow isolated from the rest of the non-profit’s budget. Depending on the by-laws of the organization, that may or may not be the case. Unless there is a minmum set amount that the organization determines it will spend on an area irrespective of special and specific additional donation, any funds that are contributed to that particular area lessen the demand for money to come from other parts of the budget.

The fungibility phenomenon isn’t restricted to non-profits, of course. Corrupt governments have been taking advantage of this phenomenon domestically through state lotteries and internationally through government-to-government foreign aid for decades.

But for the discerning giver, it’s important to note that the fungibility phenomon means that when you give, whether or not you specify a particular need or area for the funds to be used, generally you are supporting the mission of the recipient organization in all its facets, some which you may not like.

And if you’re looking for a charity whose mission you can unreservedly support, the Samaritan Guide is a great place to start.
Bookmark Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon  at del.icio.us Digg Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon Bloglines Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon Technorati Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon Bookmark Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon  at Furl.net Bookmark Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon  at reddit.com Bookmark Fundraising and the Fungibility Phenomenon  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth

Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Samuel Gregg, director of research at the Acton Institute, has a piece in today’s Detroit News titled, “Will Quran limit growth of Muslim nations?” The commentary addresses the economic outlook of Muslims, and Islamic nations, considering their religious position against the charging of interest. Gregg notes:
Given the Arab world’s increasing religiosity, however, one potential obstacle could significantly handicap these nations’ financial creativity and economic diversification policies: Islam’s prohibition of interest-charging.

Gregg also briefly examines how Christians settled the moral dilemma regarding interest:
Christianity once had a usury issue. Christianity began resolving this matter in the medieval period. Scholastic theologians established that, under certain conditions (such as free exchange economies), money was not simply a means of exchange, but also “capital”: that is, a productive good whose owners could legitimately charge others for its use. Not all interest-charging, the scholastics concluded, constituted usury.
Bookmark Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth  at del.icio.us Digg Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth Bloglines Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth Technorati Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth Bookmark Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth  at Furl.net Bookmark Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth  at reddit.com Bookmark Quran, Money Lending, and Economic Growth  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Lessig to Fight 'Corruption'

Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Lawrence Lessig, a legal scholar and high-profile advocate of copyright reform, has decided to “shift my academic work, and soon, my activism, away from the issues that have consumed me for the last 10 years, towards a new set of issues.”

His new task? “’Corruption’ as I’ve defined it elsewhere will be the focus of my work. For at least the next 10 years, it is the problem I will try to help solve.”

Just how does Lessig define “corruption”? In an extended Disclosure Statement and Statement of Principle, Lessig writes about his non-corruption principle, which is “about money.” Corruption is further defined as “the subtle pressure to take views or positions because of the financial reward they will bring you.”

Here is Lessig’s non-corruption principle, in its precise form: “I never promote as policy a position that I have been paid to advise about, consult upon, or write about. If payment is made to an institution that might reasonably be said to benefit me indirectly, then I will either follow the same rule, or disclose the payment.”

Lessig discloses the motivation for his decision, saying, “I am someone who believes that a free society -- free of the ‘corruption’ that defines our current society -- is necessary for free culture, and much more. For that reason, I turn my energy elsewhere for now.”
Bookmark Lessig to Fight 'Corruption'  at del.icio.us Digg Lessig to Fight 'Corruption' Bloglines Lessig to Fight 'Corruption' Technorati Lessig to Fight 'Corruption' Bookmark Lessig to Fight 'Corruption'  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Lessig to Fight 'Corruption'  at Furl.net Bookmark Lessig to Fight 'Corruption'  at reddit.com Bookmark Lessig to Fight 'Corruption'  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

In Praise of Money

Wednesday, May 30, 2007
“Root of all evil” or liberator of mankind? Samuel Gregg examines the role that money plays in a free economy, particularly the way it “allows people to engage in the greater specialization of economic production which produces growth.”

Read the full commentary here.
Bookmark In Praise of Money  at del.icio.us Digg In Praise of Money Bloglines In Praise of Money Technorati In Praise of Money Bookmark In Praise of Money  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark In Praise of Money  at Furl.net Bookmark In Praise of Money  at reddit.com Bookmark In Praise of Money  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places

Thursday, January 11, 2007
With all this talk of health care reform this year, I couldn’t help but do some digging into the real aspects of the proposals. Ranging from the completely disruptive universal medical care plan from California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to the socialist-like plan from Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) in the 110th congress, health care is big on the agenda for 2007. I am afraid that if the policies proposed by Schwarzenegger and Kennedy are passed, future generations will witness a detrimental effect on our economy. Kennedy’s home state of Massachusetts, being the first state to provide universal health care to its citizens, has already seen negative aspects in regards to business and job creation.

These arguments for universal health care come disguised in many forms, but all contribute negatively to the economy. The idea of making health care affordable and available to citizens is an excellent idea, however, Governor Schwarzenegger’s and Senator Kennedy’s ideas are the wrong way to go.

Forcing employers to provide health care and penalizing them for not providing coverage is not the right direction to head.
The state of Massachusetts employs a combination of subsidies and penalties to make insurance more affordable and to force people to buy it. The law requires employers with 11 or more full-time employees to offer health coverage or be subject to a $295 fee for each employee, as well as face being billed for services their uninsured employees get.

Because of this policy, employees are going to lose other benefits and suffer pay cuts, or even be fired. The cost of medical insurance is extremely high. The real solution rests in not forcing employers to provide coverage, but to make insurance more affordable.

The answer lies in eliminating all of the fraudulent law suits filed every day by money-hungry lawyers who are completely destroying the medical system. As lawyers sue doctors, malpractice insurance premiums increase. The number of personal injury litigations has steadily increased at a rate of 12% since 1975.
Jury Verdict Research, a database of plaintiff and defense verdicts, says awards in medical liability cases increased 43 percent in 1999, from $700,000 to $1,000,000. Jury awards in medical malpractice claims jumped 43 percent in one year—from $700,000 in 1999 to $1 million in 2000. Juries are compensating plaintiffs more generously than in the past. From 1994 to 2000, Jury Verdict Research found that more than half of medical malpractice jury awards were for $500,000 or more.

Seeing the direct correlation between health care cost and the cost of medical malpractice insurance for doctors (driven up by law suits), the root of the problem is obvious. This must be attacked before anything else. If Senator Kennedy and Governor Schwarzenegger want to see real progress, their plans must be disregarded and tort abuse must be solved first. There are various other aspects to their plans that are also misinformed and misdirected, but I’ll save that for another time.
Bookmark Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places  at del.icio.us Digg Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places Bloglines Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places Technorati Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places Bookmark Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places  at Furl.net Bookmark Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places  at reddit.com Bookmark Health Care Reform...In the Wrong Places  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter

Thursday, December 28, 2006
Our series on the year in review continues with the third fourth of 2006:

July

“Isn’t the Cold War Over?” David Michael Phelps

I’ve got an idea for a new sitcom. Titled, Hugo and Vladi, it details the zany adventures of two world leaders, one of whom (played by David Hyde Pierce) struggles to upkeep his image of a friendly, modern European diplomat while his goofball brother-in-law (played by George Lopez) keeps screwing it up for him by spouting off vitriolic Soviet rhetoric and threatening all of Western civilization with his agressive (but loveable) arms sales and seizures of private oil companies....

August

“Wealth, Envy, and Happiness,” Jordan J. Ballor

This natural tendency to compare our financial status to others is an expression of money envy, which also finds expression, at least in part, in the concern about income disparities....

September

“DDT Breakthrough at the WHO,” John Couretas

Africans are hailing a major shift in policy at the World Health Organization: A recommendation for the limited, indoor use of DDT to control malaria....
Bookmark 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter  at del.icio.us Digg 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter Bloglines 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter Technorati 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter Bookmark 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter  at Furl.net Bookmark 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter  at reddit.com Bookmark 2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!