Birth of Freedom Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?

Tuesday, October 28, 2008
In this week’s Birth of Freedom short video Sam Gregg, author of On Ordered Liberty, discusses the views that two influential ancient philosophers held regarding human equality and the practice of slavery.


If you haven’t seen the other 7 video shorts, you can check out the rest of the series, learn about premieres in your area, and discover more background information at www.thebirthoffreedom.com.
Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?  at del.icio.us Digg <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery? Bloglines <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery? Technorati <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery? Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?  at Furl.net Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?  at reddit.com Bookmark <em>Birth of Freedom</em> Shorts Series: How did Plato and Aristotle justify slavery?  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

World Cups of Philosophy and Theology

Monday, July 17, 2006
For those of you who are going through World Cup withdrawal after the defeat of the French by the Azzurri have a little comfort. I give you the World Cups of Philosophy and Theology.

’Nobby’ Hegel leads the Germans onto the pitch.
The first is a two-part video of the Monty Python skit featuring German philosophers against the Greeks (text here). The German side touts Leibniz in goal with strikers Nietzsche and Heidegger. The Greeks have Plato in net, with Aristotle as sweeper and Socrates at forward. The two assistant referees are, by the way, Augustine and Aquinas, while Martin Luther manages the German side.

I find it fitting that theological figures have primacy in this way over the philosophers, since this reflects the proper relationship between the two, with philosophy as the ancilla, or handmaiden, to theology. Karl Marx is a late second-half substition for the Germans.

Heraclitus captains the Ancients to victory.
You’ll need to have Google Video installed to view Part 1 here and Part 2 here (HT: The Sports Economist and Disorganizational Behavior).

Speaking of Augustine, Aquinas, and Luther, they give me a good segue to the Theology World Cup, hosted by Finnish theologian Patrik Hagman, which was searching for the greatest systematic theologian of the 20th century. Amazingly, Karl Barth did not make the field, and Pannenberg, the odds-on favorite, was knocked out rather early, losing to eventual finalist Hans Urs von Balthasar. The final featured Jürgen Moltmann against Hans Urs von Balthasar, with Moltmann being declared the victor. This proves rather convincingly that 20th century theology is much more about style than substance.

Karl Rahner was victorious in the consolation match. You can view the championship bracket here, and see how Karl Barth might have fared in the competition here (Dietrich Bonhoeffer also did not make the finals, while such dark horse candidates as T. F. Torrance did).
Bookmark World Cups of Philosophy and Theology  at del.icio.us Digg World Cups of Philosophy and Theology Bloglines World Cups of Philosophy and Theology Technorati World Cups of Philosophy and Theology Bookmark World Cups of Philosophy and Theology  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark World Cups of Philosophy and Theology  at Furl.net Bookmark World Cups of Philosophy and Theology  at reddit.com Bookmark World Cups of Philosophy and Theology  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!