The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice?

Wednesday, October 8, 2008
What is the root cause of the sub-prime crisis shaking the global economy? We need to know so we don’t allow it to screw up our economy even worse.

Many point to dishonesty and poor judgment on Wall Street. There was plenty of that leading up to the near-trillion dollar bailout, and even now the stock market is busily disciplining stupid, dishonest companies.

Others point to the many people who falsified loan applications to get mortgages beyond their means. That too played a role.

But dishonesty and poor judgment are as old as Adam and Eve. Something more was at work in the present crisis, a crisis of unprecedented scope. Why didn’t profit-minded loan companies run thorough credit checks? Why did they keep pumping out low interest loans to high risk borrowers, ignoring the risks?

It’s as if somebody spiked the financial system’s punch bowl with stupid juice, driving normally prudent financiers to dash, en masse, over the cliff.

It seems that way because it is that way. The brewers of the stupid juice were largely (if not exclusively) politicians in Washington who sought to redistribute wealth from the rich and middle class to poor people with bad credit. These politicians fostered various laws and institutions that directed, cajoled and legally bullied mortgage companies to extend big loans to people with little credit.

A case in point is a group called ACORN—Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. Stanley Kurtz explains in an Oct. 7 essay at National Review Online:

“You’ve got only a couple thousand bucks in the bank. Your job pays you dog-food wages. Your credit history has been bent, stapled, and mutilated. You declared bankruptcy in 1989. Don’t despair: You can still buy a house.” So began an April 1995 article in the Chicago Sun-Times that went on to direct prospective home-buyers fitting this profile to a group of far-left “community organizers” called ACORN, for assistance. In retrospect, of course, encouraging customers like this to buy homes seems little short of madness.

… At the time, however, that 1995 Chicago newspaper article represented something of a triumph for Barack Obama. That same year, as a director at Chicago’s Woods Fund, Obama was successfully pushing for a major expansion of assistance to ACORN, and sending still more money ACORN’s way from his post as board chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Through both funding and personal-leadership training, Obama supported ACORN. And ACORN, far more than we’ve recognized up to now, had a major role in precipitating the subprime crisis.


Continue reading "The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice?"
Bookmark The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice?  at del.icio.us Digg The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice? Bloglines The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice? Technorati The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice? Bookmark The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice?  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice?  at Furl.net Bookmark The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice?  at reddit.com Bookmark The Credit Crisis: Who Brewed the Stupid Juice?  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe

Tuesday, May 2, 2006
Where in the world would you pay $145,750 for a roll of toilet paper? According to an article in the New York Times, inflation in Zimbabwe is soaring higher than ever -- about 900 percent since President Mugabe began seizing land from wealthy landowners in 2000. And inflation is climbing at unparalleled rates.

What problems result from such rampant inflation? If inflation is climbing daily and you have $100 one day, it might be worth only $90 the next. People are spending any money that they have because whatever they buy will hold value better than cash. No money is being saved because the annual interest rates are between 4-10 percent; much less than the rates of inflation. And the government seems to think that printing more money will solve these problems.

These problems “began” when Mugabe started seizing land from wealthy white farmers in an attempt to redistribute the wealth among the native Zimbabwean population. The result, intentional or not, was that foreign investment was scared off for good. Zimbabwe’s now “solo” economy began to flounder with a lack of goods entering the market.

Let’s recap. Zimbabwe faces economic crisis (rated as a repressed economy by the Heritage Foundation, just above Burma, Iran, and North Korea) due to massive seizing of wealth and attempts at redistribution, restriction of free international trade, lack of foreign investment, and over-printing of new monies. What do you think would solve most of Zimbabwe’s economic problems? Perhaps some human dignity, some free trade, and a little less government involvement!
Bookmark Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe  at del.icio.us Digg Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe Bloglines Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe Technorati Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe Bookmark Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe  at Furl.net Bookmark Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe  at reddit.com Bookmark Economic Turmoil in Zimbabwe  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!

Super-Size Government

Tuesday, January 24, 2006
“The political left in America is emerging victorious,” writes Patrick Chisholm, and its true because “the era of big government is far from over. Trends are decidedly in favor of that quintessential leftist goal: massive redistribution of wealth.”

Over the past two decades, “Republicans’ capture of both Congress and the White House was, understandably, a demoralizing blow to the left. But the latter can take solace that ”Republican“ is no longer synonymous with spending restraint, free markets, and other ideals of the political right.”

Chisholm cites the fact that since 2000, “During the first five years of President Bush’s presidency, nondefense discretionary spending (i.e., spending decided on an annual basis) rose 27.9 percent, far more than the 1.9 percent growth during President Clinton’s first five years, according to the libertarian Reason Foundation. And according to Citizens Against Government Waste, the number of congressional ‘pork barrel’ projects under Republican leadership during fiscal 2005 was 13,997, more than 10 times that of 1994.”

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg, since “discretionary spending is dwarfed by mandatory spending - spending that cannot be changed without changing the laws.”

Read the whole thing: “Triumph of the redistributionist left.”
Bookmark Super-Size Government  at del.icio.us Digg Super-Size Government Bloglines Super-Size Government Technorati Super-Size Government Bookmark Super-Size Government  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Super-Size Government  at Furl.net Bookmark Super-Size Government  at reddit.com Bookmark Super-Size Government  with wists Bookmark using any bookmark manager!