‘With God all things are possible’
Religion & Liberty Online

‘With God all things are possible’

Matthew 19:23-26 (New International Version)

Then Jesus said to his disciples, “I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?” Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

During an appearance last week on “Hardball with Chris Matthews,” Congressman Charles Rangel from New York did us all the service of exegeting the above passage from the Scriptures.

Here’s the exchange:

MATTHEWS: I mean, Charlie, Jesus didn’t hang around with the swells, the rich people.

RANGEL: Well, he said the rich are going straight to hell.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Well, he did not.

(LAUGHTER)

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: He said it is harder to get through a needle’s…

(CROSSTALK)

RANGEL: No. But the deal with St. Matthews and all these people are trying to get into heaven. And he said, hey, when I was hungry, you didn’t feed me. I was thirsty. I was naked. I was sick. You didn’t do all these—he’s talking about food stamps, Social Security.

MATTHEWS: Right.

RANGEL: He’s talking about taking care of those who haven’t got. So, when it comes to moral value, my Republican friends can decide which side the pope was on.

It’s refreshing that Chris Matthews was keen enough to provide a somewhat more accurate description of Jesus’ words than did Rep. Rangel. So often, however, the critically important conclusion to the exchange between Jesus and his disciples is overlooked: “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

But back to Rangel’s point. In Jesus’ words about the sheep and the goats (Matthew 25:31-46), was Jesus talking about food stamps and Social Security? Or was he talking about the practice of private charity? Or something else?

Rep. Rangel has long held that the biblical mandate to care for the poor, the orphan, and the widow is identical with the activities of the governmental welfare state. Here’s video of an exchange from Jan. 20, 1995 between Rep. Rangel and Rev. Robert Sirico on “Illegitimacy and Welfare,” testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee.

 

Jordan J. Ballor

Jordan J. Ballor (Dr. theol., University of Zurich; Ph.D., Calvin Theological Seminary) is director of research at the Center for Religion, Culture & Democracy, an initiative of the First Liberty Institute. He has previously held research positions at the Acton Institute and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and has authored multiple books, including a forthcoming introduction to the public theology of Abraham Kuyper. Working with Lexham Press, he served as a general editor for the 12 volume Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology series, and his research can be found in publications including Journal of Markets & Morality, Journal of Religion, Scottish Journal of Theology, Reformation & Renaissance Review, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Faith & Economics, and Calvin Theological Journal. He is also associate director of the Junius Institute for Digital Reformation Research at Calvin Theological Seminary and the Henry Institute for the Study of Christianity & Politics at Calvin University.