U.S. troops who proselytize are guilty of sedition and treason and should be punished to stave off a “tidal wave of fundamentalists.” That’s what Mikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, told Fox News. Weinstein and his group met privately with Pentagon officials on April 23 to try to convince them to punish military officers who engage in such devious evangelistic tactics as having a Christian bumper sticker on their car or a Bible on their desk. Weinstein says such activities can can amount to “pushing this fundamentalist version of Christianity on helpless subordinates.”

military“If a member of the military is proselytizing in a manner that violates the law, well then of course they can be prosecuted,” he said. “We would love to see hundreds of prosecutions to stop this outrage of fundamentalist religious persecution.”

“[Proselytizing] is a version of being spiritually raped and you are being spiritually raped by fundamentalist Christian religious predators,” Weinstein told Fox News.

The Pentagon confirmed to Fox News that Christian proselytization is against regulations. “Religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense, LCDR Nate Christensen said in a written statement.

Michael L. “Mikey” Weinstein, who served as White House Counsel in the Reagan administration and general counsel to H.Ross Perot, is an anti-religion extremist who is not taken seriously by anyone outside the secular political left (see here to see how unhinged he can be). But if Pentagon officials become convinced that his peculiar anti-evangelism perspective is indeed within the bounds of military regulations, it could have a chilling effect on how Christians in the military share their faith.

Everyone in the military agrees that a leader should not be coercive or use their power and influence to force their religion on anyone. In my entire career in the Marines I never once heard a commander suggest anything coercive, such as that we were expected to attend their Bible study. But I did have many leaders that invited me to church or talked about their faith with both believers (like me) and those who did not share our faith. Should they have been court-martialed? Will they be in the future?

Unfortunately, while we used to be able to answer such questions with an obvious “no,” the answer is no longer so clear. The current administration has established a shameful reputation for disregarding the religious freedoms of American citizens. While Christians will want to give them the benefit of the doubt, the Pentagon should make it clear that they will respect the religious liberties of the men and women whose job it is to protect such freedoms.

Update: Over at Mirror of Justice, my friend Rick Garnett has an excellent post on proselytism, evangelization, and the First Amendment in which he raises a very significant point about balance:

. . . it seems to me really important that any regulations and policies designed to (quite appropriately) protect our men and women in the service from abuses of superiors’ authority (whether those abuses involve unwanted and aggressive religious messages, or take any other form) not reflect a premise or presumption that the content of traditional religious teachings and practices is substantively objectionable and therefore not-to-be-discussed-or-advocated in the armed services and also not reflect a premise or presumption that evangelism itself — the invitation to “come over” — (as opposed to abusive instances of it) is objectionable, even among members of the service.

  • http://twitter.com/mookiebusiness Dean Crist

    While I very much agree with your analysis and concern, I would suggest that commentating on Mr. Wienstein’s person — “extremist” — takes away from the strength of your argument. That word has been over-applied and misapplied so badly (often by people like Mr. Wienstein himself), that it has lost all of it’s meaning. Let the man’s statements speak for themselves… they are very clear and it puts you above the fray of ad hominem nonsense that is so pervasive in today’s dialogue.

  • Pingback: Jew Mikey Weinstein wants to ban Christianity from the military - Stormfront

  • Pingback: God and Country » US Military Clarifies Religious Policy, Disavows Weinstein Agenda

  • http://www.facebook.com/troy.laack Troy Laack

    You missed the part in the Huffington Post article where Weinstein says, “Neither MRFF (Military Religious Freedom Foundation) nor any other genuine religious freedom organization of any repute has ever championed — and never would champion — that evangelical Christians, as a whole, should be ousted from the government or the military. We demand only that people of all faiths (or no faith) obey their solemnly sworn oath to the Constitution and follow the military’s regulations regarding religion.” Weinstein also wrote in his column, “Many of its leaders have engaged in the crudest type of name-calling, describing LGBT people as ‘perverts with ‘filthy habits’ who seek to snatch the children of straight parents and ‘convert’ them to gay sex.” Those are the “Christians” in the military Weinstein is targeting, not Christians in the military who express their belief in Jesus, have Bibles on their desks or display Christian bumper stickers, etc.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003586781928 Magdalene Prodigal

    Wasn’t there a revolution so that Americans can be free? And now only the secularists can promote their lack of faith?