Blog author: dpahman
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
By

Portrait of a Child Prince, Wikimedia Commons

“Anyone concerned with the future,” wrote Sergius Bulgakov,

is most anxious about the younger generation. But to be spiritually dependent on it, to truckle to its opinions and take it as a standard, testifies to a society’s spiritual weakness. In any case, an entire historical period and the whole spiritual tenor of intelligentsia heroism are symbolized by the fact that the ideal of the Christian saint, the ascetic, has been replaced here by the revolutionary student.”

Bulgakov is writing in 1909 about the young, sectarian intellectuals of Russian society, who according to Nicholas Berdyaev were “artificially isolated from national life.” They had taken upon themselves a sort of megalomania, assuming to be the heroic saviors of Russia, a sort of atheistic incarnation of Providence. The student, full of passion and idealism, had become the Übermensch for educated Russians, only barely subdued by the failed revolution of 1905. To Bulgakov, this idealizing of the youth amounted to a “spiritual pedocracy.” Russian society looked to the youth—the least experienced and therefore least wise—for spiritual leadership. Are we making the same mistake in America today?

Our culture today is not the same as Russia in the early twentieth century. The young (including myself, no doubt) are no less idealistic or isolated today than the Russian intelligentsia, but on the whole we lack a strong revolutionary spirit by comparison. Instead, our society idealizes youth in general, most prominently in pop culture, focusing on pleasure over power-struggle. It is not controversial to assert that youth has become the American ideal: magazines, television, anti-aging products, “contemporary” worship services, youth-designed concept cars (!), our whole tech-savvy culture in which the youth do indeed have a natural advantage—even those with good motives end up “truckling” to our opinions, taking us as the standard.

Indeed, the new study conducted jointly by Public Religion Research Institute and Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, which I have recently commented on, is only one among many similar studies in recent times. Back in December I too jumped to the hasty conclusion that my generation was uniquely irreligious due to a Barna study saying roughly the same thing at that time. However, in my most recent post I cast doubt upon the significance of this conclusion. It is true that the youth are less religious and more idealistic than older generations today, but when compared with similar statistics regarding older generations when they were the same age, the trend may be quite typical of the youth at any point in time. Perhaps the youth are just young.

Whatever the case, it is my conviction that the peril at hand is not that the Millennial generation is less religious, more liberal, leaving the church, etc. It is that we seem to be obsessed with the youth at all. If we put young adults on a pedestal—as we have done and continue to do—if we look to them, to my generation, to be the makers of culture, to set the standard, to create their own identities, then we will encourage spiritual stagnation by idealizing the Millennial generation’s uncertainty and confusion, their personal journeys, as an end. After all, if we have already “arrived,” then there can be no improvement from our present condition. Stunted growth is the new tall.

What we need instead, in my opinion, is a new ideal. (Perhaps this is where my own idealism reveals itself.) Where is “the Christian saint, the ascetic,” in our mindset today? Where is the elderly sage, the wise man or woman? Where are the people who have no desire to “have it their way” but seek the betterment of others at their own expense with mature minds and pure hearts refined by faith, self-discipline, self-denial, and, above all, experience? Just like the Russian intelligentsia, we view them as relics (in the pejorative sense) of an age long passed, dead and gone, to our own detriment. Indeed, many depict the elderly today as “cute,” ignore them, hide them away in “homes.” Anything not to take them seriously. Anything to silence their voices. But, if we are to turn the tides of our American spiritual pedocracy, we desperately need them… now, more than ever.


  • http://www.jordanballor.com/ Jordan Ballor

    Much to consider in this fine post. It strikes me that this peril is at play in a number of areas in our contemporary life, including education. What happens when the student (of whatever age) becomes the customer, and the customer is king? Or as Condescending Wonka put it today: “Oh, you’re the most popular kid at school? It’s impressive that your life peaked before adulthood.”

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1060874428 Dylan James O’Brien Pahman

      I agree. In effort to cater to students, we have dumbed-down education and saturated the job market with degrees, decreasing their value and increasing the number of underemployed and educated unemployed. As a result of efforts to better serve students, students have suffered a great disservice.

      • http://www.jordanballor.com/ Jordan Ballor

        Btw, a better caption for the wonderfully appropriate photo would be: “It wasn’t me. She did it!”

  • Roger McKinney

    Excellent post! This attitude is affecting Christian young men in that they seem determined not to grow up. We have had to fight this in my family. The goal of young men seems to be to remain as irresponsible as possible as long as possible. Christian young women seem to be taking the lead in education and work. 

  • Miller_g

    In previous cultures and centuries, life was hard.  Very few were insulated from pain, suffering, and financial/material deprivation.  You worked to survive.  You worked hard to educate and spare your offspring from hardships you knew.  How many of the wealthy (even today) innovated and worked hard because they once knew poverty?  (In an interview with the owner of the Dallas Cowboys, he shared just such a story).

    I’d maintain that insofar as we artificially protect the young from those things and claim freedom from them as “rights”, we fatten the foul afflictions of sloth and entitlement that are finally coming home to roost.  Why should a person work when they can have food, shelter, cable TV, a car, and the latest smartphone while collecting charity and government welfare, or working a minimum wage job?  I know it’s a somewhat simplistic picture I’m painting, but I’ve met many in my (volunteer) work with the St. Vincent de Paul Society that’ve become completely institutionalized and dependent on government and charitable aid.   

    • http://www.jordanballor.com/ Jordan Ballor

      I saw the film “The Descendants,” which was intriguing on a number of levels, but which I didn’t actually like all that much. But perhaps the best line of the movie had to do with the question of how much money rich parents would leave for their children. Here’s what Matt King (George Clooney’s character) said: “I don’t want my daughters growing up entitled and spoiled. And I agree with my father: you give your children enough money to do something but not enough to do nothing.”

  • Pingback: The Impious Legacy of US Education | @ActonInstitute PowerBlog | @ActonInstitute PowerBlog()